Non-Consent

Surety bonds provide financial guarantees that bondholders such as public officials, companies, contractors or unions will uphold their contracts according to mutual terms. If a public servant does not act in your best interest, you can file a claim against his or her bond company.

Bond Blueprint to Destroy Local Tyrants doc
Bond Letters for Governor & Sheriff doc
Bond Request Letter doc

Notice of Removal of Implied Right of Access .docx
Requirement for Consent .pdf
Paul Rosenberg: Withdrawal of Consent, 6/7/16 .doc
WITHDRAWAL AND SPECIFICATION OF CONSENT .pdf
Consent - Anna von Reitz got it right, 9/24/14 .pdf
Dear Official, Don't tread on me pdf

Hospitals are paid up to $100k per CoVID patient and are torure and slaughter houses: Payments to Hospitals mov
Medical Directive against Ventilators and Remdesivir doc
Medical Exemption Form pdf
Medical Power of Attorney doc

Lockdown Non-Consent

Sample Email To Send To Sheriff’s, Police, Mayor .doc

Peggy Hall: Documents, letters, fliers and cards to print and distribute.
Peggy Hall Explains Why California Businesses Can Stay Open Legally and How Requiring Masks Violates 22 Laws, 12/11/20
Peggy Hall: Businesses! Just Stay Open!!!, 12/9/20

Face Mask Non-Consent

Businesses: Know the law .pdf; Welcome ,pdf
face mask exempt .jpg
Face Mask flier .pdf
Fear non-consent .png
Legal Rights To Not Wear a Mask .pdf
Mask legal notice .pdf
No Mask card front .png
No Mask card back .png
Facemask & sanitizer exemption .jpg
Masks - U.S. Civil Rights Violation pdf

Prepare With Jerry: Mandated Vaccinations, Get Ready To Say "NO!", 4/21/20 .mp4

Editable PROMIC Self Exemption Form pdf
Decision to Not Vaccinate My Child .pdf
Refusal of Vaccination for Cause .doc
Is Your Employer Attempting To Mandate Vaccines pdf
Form for Employees Whose Employers Are Requiring Covid-19 Injectons .pdf
Employer Letter doc
Form for Employees pdf
Opt-Out Employer Form pdf
Affidavit - Get Jab or be Fired , legal points pdf
Vaccination Non-consent for Physicians and Schools .doc
we_don't_need 111x65

Vaccination Conditional Agreement .doc
Vaccination Conditional Acceptance .pdf
Notice of Non-Consent to HR 6666 .doc
Catholic Exemption doc
For US Air Force doc
Religious Exemption Template For College Students doc
Vaccine Exemption Full Military doc, pdf
Vaccine Exemption Practical Side Supporting doc, pdf
Vaccine Exemption Supporting doc, pdf
Vaccine Exemption Religious Side Supporting doc, pdf
OREGON HEALTH AUTHORITY MEDICAL EXCEPTION FORM docx
OREGON HEALTH AUTHORITY RELIGIOUS EXCEPTION FORM docx
Vaccine Notice of Liability pdf, doc
Vaccine Notice of Liability [Parent-Minor] pdf

Before they knock on your door: Post a No Trespassing sign that adheres to the ordinances or statutes of your state. Here's one for Oregon: Oregon Closed to Entry - No Trespassing .doc

When they knock on your door: Have your door locked. Do not allow entry. From a 20 year law enforcement officer, see here or here.
1. Do not open your door or communicate in any way.
OR
2. Record everything. Knowing you do not have to give them any information or engage in dialogue, clearly say you're trespassing - get off my property. Ask for photos and identification and photograph license plates. Do not leave them unattended. If they try to engage you in their scripted dialogue, say it again. If they do it a 3rd time, tell them they've got 60 seconds to get off your property. Tic, tic, tic... Then call 911.

If you have good police, they will arrest the trespassers and then release them at the police station with a misdeamenor summons.

If your police are pansy mask wearers, they may be reluctant to press charges. Demand it. You have that right. The trespassers committed a criminal violation against you and you have the right to insist on charges being pressed. The officers will be mandated to at least issue summonses and set a court date.

If the police refuse, then call their supervisor; and, if you still can't get satisfaction, file an internal affairs complaint against the officers and then go directly to your local prosecuter's office. They can issue a criminal summons also. With your like minded neighbors, hire a pit bull attorney and file a lawsuit. Sometimes that is the only way to get results.

Smart Meter Non-Consent

EMF Scientific Studies .pdf
Smart Meter Facts .pdf
Fire Hazard Warning .doc
Notice of Default .doc
Notice of Fraud .doc
Notice of Liability .doc
Notice to Wireless Assailant .doc
Off Grid Solar planning guide .doc
Posted Notice to Installers .doc
Revocation of OptOut .doc
Surge Protection Request .doc
Warning Notice to Passers By .doc

Responding to Offers or Demands

We have an unlimited ability to contract with our fellow human beings in any way that we choose. Our choices are dependent not upon our circumstances, but only upon our knowledge and will and creative intelligence.

Whether in commerce or law or life, whenever someone demands something from us, it is an offer to contract. There are only five ways we can respond to an offer to contract.
1) We can ignore;
2) We can argue or contest;
3) We can reject the offer or refuse for cause, without dishonor, as long as it is an erroneous claim and there is no liability evidenced (see UCC 3-501);
4) We can accept; or
5) We can conditionally accept.

Ignoring is dishonoring, both to the offerer and the offeree. In commerce, it means agreeing by acquiescence. If someone sends us a bill and we ignore it, we have committed a commercial dishonor and we have agreed that we owe it. They have become the creditor in the matter and we have become the debtor/ slave.

Arguing is dishonoring to everyone as well, no matter how righteous it seems. Ultimately, no points of view are absolutely valid and in a fight, force and deception are relied upon by all but the saintliest of parties. The loser will certainly become a debtor in the matter; the victor's creditorship may be a crime.

Honorably rejecting and the two ways of accepting are the only ways we can remain in honor and take full responsibility for our life and our world and not be a victim or a debtor. Full acceptance is appropriate when we agree with the substance and form of whatever is being offered. Conditional acceptance is more appropriate when we are not sure about those things.

All conditional acceptances are counter-offers: "Sure, I'll go to town with you if you help me clean up that mess first" OR "Sure, I'll accept that upon proof of your claim, in the form of a signed affidavit by you, under penalties of perjury and under your personal, unlimited commercial liability".

Learning how to accept conditionally is fundamental to learning how to remain in creditor relationship with and be able to freely control any situation.

Private vs. Public

It is important to know the difference between the private and the public, because we all have private and public identities and we can handle private and public affairs from the private, but we cannot handle private affairs from the public. This latter is one of the biggest mistakes many people make when trying to handle their commercial and lawful (private) or legal (public) affairs.

In our society, the private 'Strawman' was created by the application for the birth certificate; it is an international vessel in maritime law.

The public STRAWMAN was created by the application for the Social Security card; it is the national vessel in the law of admiralty.

John Doe is a non-resident alien in relation to the public. He exists in the republic. He has inalienable rights and unlimited liabilities.

JOHN DOE is a U.S. citizen. He exists in the democracy. He has benefits and obligations and limited liability.

In the private, money is an asset and always in the form of something that has intrinsic value, i.e. gold or silver. Payment for anything is in the form of commercial set off, now.

In the public, money is a liability and normally in the form of a promissory note, i.e. an FRN, a check, bond or note. Payment is in the form of discharge; in the future.

The private realm is the basis for all contract and commerce; the public was created by the bankruptcy of the private entity. Generally, creditors can operate from the private. Public entities are all debtors (or slaves).

Therefore, it is good to learn how to be a creditor in all of our affairs. Freedom is possible in the private; it is not even a valid fantasy in the realm of the public.

Creditor or Debtor

Playing well the game of commerce means being a creditor, not a debtor.

Debtors take positions, defend what they know and make statements about it; they ignore, argue and/or contest. Extreme debtor-minded people presume victimhood and seek to limit their liability. Debtors operate unwittingly from and within the public venue. They are satisfied with mere equitable title - they can own and operate, but not totally control their property. Debtor possibilities are limited and confining, as debtors are slaves.

Creditors are present to whatever opportunity arises; they ask questions to bring remedy if called for; they accept, either fully or conditionally. Accomplished creditors take full responsibility for their life, their finances and their world. Creditors understand and make use of their unlimited ability to contract privately with anyone they want at any time. They maintain legal title and control of their property. Creditor possibilities are infinite. Creditors are sovereign and free.

Whether dealing with creditors, debt, collectors, the tax man, a cop, an agent, clerk or a judge, it is essential to be in honor to effectively handle commercial offers and demands. Actually, this is true of all of human relating and it is the only way to really be in integrity. It is also the only way to deserve to be confident to win.

So, #1 rule: If you're not in honor, get in honor. If you are in honor, stay in honor.

How? Simple. First, never ignore. To ignore is to dishonor and, in fact, to ignore is to agree by acquiescence with whomever is confronting you. Always respond timely to whatever is in front of you.

Secondly, never argue. Turn any argument you might ever be inclined to make into a conditional acceptance. They may look very similar, but the difference is the same as between night and day. Also, every conditional acceptence is a counter-offer and the only offer that is ever relevent is the one on top - for the moment, yours, and you are in control of the matter. Ex.: "I'll accept that upon proof of bona-fide claim in the form of a signed affidavit by you under penalty of perjury and under your own personal, unlimited commerical liablility within 30 days."

Thirdly: Generally, avoid making positive statements that someone can challenge you to prove. Sovereigns never put themselves into position to ever have to prove anything; we always put the burden of proof upon whomever may be challenging us. Therefore turn positive statements into negative averments and/or questions.

An averment that is negative in form but affirmative in substance must be proved by the alleging party. “There is no evidence that I am not correct in this matter and there is no evidence that you are not wrong in this matter, and I don’t believe that any such evidence exists.” You’re stating what is not; not what is.

Questions are our most effective tools. Who controls any conversation? He or she who asks the questions. Watch, for instance, how judges always answer questions with questions - it behooves the sovereign to do the same thing.

Even our court system is a commercial venue. Let's say a so-called creditor has taken you, John Doe, to court. In your first turn to speak, you may say: "Your honor, there appears to be no evidence that BoA is in honor in this matter [neg. aver.]; there doesn't seem to exist any evidence that John Doe has not been in honor in this entire process [another neg. aver.]; does any reason exist that this case should not be immediately resolved in favor of John Doe? [question]

If judges answered questions, the judge would almost have no choice other than to agree. Much more likely though, the judge may respond with: "Well didn't you use that credit card; didn't you buy lots of items with it?"

At this point, if you were to respond with: "Yes, but...", you probably wouldn't get too far past the 'but' when the judge would interrupt and say "Judgement in favor of the plaintiff".

A sovereign would instead come back with another question: "Well, isn't that a moot point, your honor? Again, there doesn't appear to be any evidence that..." Get the point?

Another example, making good use of questions, illustrates what is called a 'confession and avoidance', a response in which the accused admits (via passive acquiescence) the allegations but asks for additional facts that deprive the admitted facts of an adverse legal effect.

Accusation: "Is this your signature on this document?"

Response(s): "Is there a defect in that instrument?"

“Well tell me the defect is and I’ll correct it.”

“Well, if there is no defect in the instrument, then why are you here?”

“Why should I answer your question when you can’t even answer mine?” “Are you telling me that you are not even qualified to make any determinations on that negotiable instrument?" “Why are you here?”

Do you see how effective questions can be? See: Play a game?

You can talk to 20 different people and you're likely to get 20 different answers as to what sovereignty is all about, but the truth is that sovereignty is about one thing: Your ability to control your property and your freedom, starting with your body and your mind. If you can do this, you are sovereign.

Another way to define sovereignty: Your ability to control your contracting. Obviously, there are billions of us on this planet, but we can all control our contracting by remembering to be and stay in honor.